Holtham Commission publishes working paper on needs-based replacement to the Barnett formula

The Independent Commission on Funding and Finance for Wales has published a ‘working paper’ on a needs-based approach to devolution finance.  It’s available here.  The Commission’s press notice about it is here.

The Commission have attempted a short-form approach to assessing need by using a number of key (or proxy) indicators of need.  Their finding is that these factors – different levels of health, different age structures to the population (as old and young people need services more than the middle-aged) and so forth – mean that £115 should be spent in Wales to have an equivalent effect to £100 spent in England on comparable functions. (This mirrors the approach recommended by the Lords Barnett Formula Committee, although that committee didn’t identify specific factors to use or attach any specific values to the amounts payable.)  They also apply their approach to Scotland and Northern Ireland, for which they calculate spending levels of £105 and £121 per £100 in England.  The published data don’t make it clear what impact that would have in Scotland.  However, looking at overall public spending (not taking into account the functions that are devolved there and those that are reserved to the UK level) public spending in Scotland was £118 for each £100 in England in 2007-08 (and £125 in Northern Ireland).  That implies a significant reduction in public spending in Scotland, with all the political difficulties that entails.

The Commission also appear to recommend using increased incremental payments as the major element of the transition mechanism, to bring the grant for Wales from where it is to where they say it should be.  It’s dubious how workable this is given the financial austerity that is coming, however.



Filed under Devolution finance, Wales

4 responses to “Holtham Commission publishes working paper on needs-based replacement to the Barnett formula

  1. Guy Lodge

    The Holtham paper is politically explosive for Scotland – good piece by David Bell in today’s Scotsman.

  2. I quite agree. David Bell’s piece needs ‘premium’ level access, but a summary is available at http://news.scotsman.com/news/New-cash-deal-could-cost.5891299.jp

  3. russell mellett

    If the transfer to Scotland is overvalued, while those to Wales and NIreland are undervalued, one approach would be to freeze Scottish payments while allowing those of Wales and NIreland to increase until transfers are more in line with underlying needs. If Barnett determined transfers are going to decrease, perhaps the inverse could occur. So payments to Scotland would decline, while those of Wales and NIreland could be frozen.

  4. Pingback: Scotland: the Tories and the SNP « Devolution Matters

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s