Joint Ministerial Committee meets in dispute-resolution mode

It isn’t normally the role of Devolution Matters to break news, but readers will probably be interested to know that the Joint Ministerial Committee met for the first time in its ‘dispute resolution mode’ on Wednesday morning.  This form of it was only created in March, as a result of the new protocol on dispute resolution and avoidance (discussed HERE; see also HERE). The issue that was chosen was that of consequentials for spending on the 2012 London Olympics (itself discussed HERE), and the fact that this issue was to be referred to the disputes resolution procedure was announced following the first plenary JMC of the new government in June (the Scottish Government news release on that is here, and my post about that is HERE).

No government has yet issued a press release on the outcome, so we don’t know what happened.  This may simply reflect a degree of sensitivity about the issue and a need to agree the wording of such a news release.  But this is sufficiently interesting and important that governments shouldn’t be concealing from the wider public the fact that it has happened.  In most other systems, the news would publicly announced as soon as the meeting concluded.

It is, of course, no wonder that this issue has been referred to the new disputes resolution procedure.  It’s one where the behaviour of HM Treasury was particularly arbitrary and high-handed, and offended pretty much any sense of fairness.  It’s also one where all three devolved governments have exactly the same interest (which can’t be said of some other devolved grievances).  As a first issue with which to test the new procedure, it’s a strong case to use.  However, its very strength will have put Francis Maude (who was chairing the hearing) in a difficult position.  If he agrees with the devolved governments, he will cost the Treasury several hundreds of millions of pounds in the run-up to the comprehensive spending review.  He’s also inviting further use of the procedure (and apparently there are a number of other issues that are likely to be referred to it).  The only political salve will be the opportunity to blame the former Labour UK Government for the whole mess.  If he doesn’t agree with the devolved administrations, given the strength of the devolved position, it will taint the new procedure seriously, and make it much harder for the UK Government to use the new procedure to contain disputes and avoid them turning into bitter political disagreements raised at every turn.  It will be fascinating to see the outcome, and how it is presented, when the governments do decide to share that with us.

Advertisements

15 Comments

Filed under Devolution finance, Intergovernmental relations

15 responses to “Joint Ministerial Committee meets in dispute-resolution mode

  1. Given that David Cameron doesn’t want to be prime minister of England, who speaks for England in these negotiations?

    There’s a real lack of transparency over the horse-trading that goes on between the British government and the devolved nations, exemplified by their continued refusal to release the minutes of the Cabinet sub-committee on Devolution to Scotland, Wales and the Regions. There’s no way that anyone in England can be sure that the British Government and Cabinet is arguing England’s corner in the same way that Alex Salmond does for Scotland. It’s very undemocratic.

  2. Pingback: More on the JMC (disputes) « Devolution Matters

  3. Pingback: Wales and the Spending Review « Devolution Matters

  4. Pingback: The uselessness of the Scottish Variable Rate « Devolution Matters

  5. Pingback: Some lessons for Wales from the Scotland bill « Devolution Matters

  6. Pingback: Wales will find itself moaning on the sidelines

  7. Pingback: JMC (Domestic) meets, and talks about public spending « Devolution Matters

  8. Pingback: Three First Ministers (and two Deputy FMs) meet in Edinburgh « Devolution Matters

  9. Pingback: The 2011 plenary meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee « Devolution Matters

  10. Pingback: Click on Wales » Blog Archive » The 2011 plenary meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee

  11. Pingback: The 2012 Olympics and the Barnett formula: an end to the row « Devolution Matters

  12. Pingback: Click on Wales » Blog Archive » Treasury blocks Welsh funding claims

  13. Pingback: Click on Wales » Blog Archive » Better intergovernmental relations for better devolution

  14. Pingback: Better intergovernmental relations for better devolution | The Constitution Unit Blog

  15. Pingback: A more systematic approach to relations between the devolved administrations and the UK government is required : Democratic Audit UK

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s